Abstract

This document is a WIP, working document, mixture of many sources of documentation linked to the Route Style GUI part, as presented to the user.

PCB means PCB/gEDA, or mainline, pcb-rnd is the primary focus for this WIP.

1. Introduction

1.1. What is a Route Style

The Edit ▸ Route Styles menu allows you to select a style which is a group of line thickness, via diameter, via drill size, and clearance (keepaway) (collectively called a routing style) to be copied to the active sizes. You can also change the names given to the routing styles and adjust their values from Edit ▸ Route Styles ▸ Edit menu.

The active sizes are also adjustable from this menu (How ?). The active sizes are shown in the status-line and control the initial size of new vias, drilling holes, lines, clearances, text-objects and also the maximum dimensions of the board layout.

A routing style can be attributed to a net. (How ?, How am I sure all the nets/lines/tracks are affected to the selected routing style ?)

1.2. Using the autorouter

Do we still have the autorouter ? Is what is described next working elsewhere ?

Use routing styles in the netlist to have per-net routing styles. Note that the routing style will be used for an entire net. This means if you have a wide metal setting for a power net you will need to manually route breakouts from any fine pitch parts on their power pins because the router will not be able to change to a narrow trace to connect to the part.

2. Design intentions

2.1. pcb-rnd goals

  • Alleviate the limitation of 4 only different route styles.

  • Keep track of "current" route style

2.2. pcb-rnd implementation prior 1.2.1

A radio-button area + extra dialog

2.2.1. Add a new route style

This is ensured via the <New> selection

gtk2 edit route styles 001
Figure 1. Edit route styles dialog

Q: No Add button: historical reasons. The original code in mainline has 4 route styles, hardwired. It can not remove styles. We inherited the mechanism of adding style by selecting the <New>. (In mainline if you add styles more than 4, they are lost on save).

The inherited code tries not to do modifications immediately but only when you close the window. This is a common pattern in the gtk hid at the moment: all data from core copied to some "hid_gtk-specific" mirror cache for the dialog, then the dialog works on the cache and it is copied back when you close the dialog.

Igor2 thinks the idea was that the dialogs are modal and if the user says cancel, you just don’t do the copy-back. It’s a lot of extra code and complication. The strange <new style> mechanism might be a result of this: the dialog-cache is probably not smart enough to hold multiple new styles, but with the current mechanism you can add only one new style until you close the dialog.

2.2.2. Keep track of current route style

This is ensured via the <custom> selection in dialog.

At the end you are not drawing with the selected style, you are drawing with a pen. When you change style, all parameters of the style are copied into the pen. However, you can change any parameter of the pen with hotkeys, which means you can easily end up drawing with a pen that does not match any of the currently existing styles.

Mainline has this too, it’s all inherited.

Using such a custom pen is useful when you want to draw a single net of some special geometry - it is not worth adding a new style, but you may still want to set the temporary pen up properly.

The problem was that when you used such a custom pen, you didn’t really have a way to see your current setting and besides the add +5 mils kind of hotkeys, you couldn’t really set it up, e.g. "I want 80 mil wide traces temporarily" was hard to do. So I introduced the <current> style, which shows the current settings of the pen so it is not hidden anymore.

Lapsus here from Igor, who really means <current>. I suggest to rename it <current> ??

This way you can see and change all parameters of the pen, without having to create a new style or having to use CLI actions.

Igor2 definitely wants to keep <custom> in the gtk2 hid, wants to add it in the lesstif hid and wants all new GUI hids to support it the same way.

<current> mode is indicated by not selecting any style (no radio button selected). As long as your pen matches any of the existing style, you are drawing with that style and the style is marked in the radio button. When you change your pen to something that doesn’t match any existing style, the radio button turns off.

This is by design, Igor2 likes it, miloh, with whom we coded it likes it too. Please do not change this.

PCB Mainline does the same, except:

  • you can’t see or modify the numeric fields of the <custom> style directly (only modification possible is via hotkeys)

  • you can’t explicitly switch to the <custom> style (you need to make a hotkey-modification of the pen)

But the pen concept exists there too: press Ctrl+Shift+V, it will change the via drill size of the pen. This will result in a pen not matching any existing style → radio button selection disappears.

2.3. PCB

mainline has no explicit <custom>, no delete button and has the hardwired number of 4 styles.

2.4. pcb-rnd Next

Honestly, I don’t like it and want to change it (in all dialog boxes,even in gtk2):

  • I want the dialog boxes non-modal: you should be able to edit the layout while the route style dialog is open

  • I want changes to happen immediately - so if you change the line width for a style and draw with it, it should have immediate effect

  • I want to add undo code for the route style changes; I think the original idea behind. Combining non-modal dialog and immediate effect makes cancel meaningless, but if the user has the usual, central undo, that’s fine.

3. GTK2 situation

3.1. User manual

Document this part…​ Most of the info are above. Select and create a section → See FIXME.

Especially, document Attributes

  • what for ?

  • expected key, values ?

  • format ? units ?

gtk2 pcb rnd 001
Figure 2. pcb-rnd on an empty design, with Edit Route Style dialog open
Where is saved "as default" ? Documentation here ?

3.2. Short-term improvements ?

This seems to be low priority w.r.t. cairo and GTK3…​ Am I right ?

4. GTK3 design proposal

TODO: A mock-up (screenshot)

A GtkTreeView, allowing the direct rename of style, allow sorting, or drag and drop the styles to change order.

Can be selected (highlighted) to show the active route style.

GtkButtonBox with usual buttons : Add, Delete, Raise, Down …​

Still another dialog is needed for other infos…​

5. GTK2 retro-fit ?

If so, then trade for a less advanced GtkTreeView

GtkHButtonBox i.s.o GtkButtonBox.